Airmen test limits at Ranger Assessment Course

  • Published
  • By Vicki Stein
  • AFIMSC Public Affairs
JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas -- Imagine signing up to be starved, sleep deprived, and trying to fight for your life in survival challenges during a 19-day combat leadership course in the mosquito-, rattlesnake- and wild boar-infested hilly terrain north of San Antonio with 28 other Airmen you don’t know.  

That was the scenario for 28 men and one woman who took part in the Ranger Assessment Course at Camp Bullis, Texas, October 29 – November 16 with the chance upon successful completion to enroll in the coveted, yet even more grueling, Army Ranger Course. One of the 12 instructors, Tech. Sgt. Gavin Saiz from the 435th Security Forces Squadron at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, talked about RAC as a combat leadership course and how they emphasize doctrine and use a host of tactical and technical procedures to instruct the students. Saiz said that the students have to learn and apply a firehose of information in a short period.  


Qualified Airmen from any career field can attend the course, which is held twice a year. Efforts are underway to see if the course can be expanded to four times a year in order to conduct them in U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa and Pacific Air Forces. If the applicant is physically and mentally qualified, they can enroll in the course, but not everyone makes it to the finish line. The course has a 66-percent fail rate.

 
Since 1955 when the Army began accepting Airmen into its school, nearly 300 Airmen have earned the Ranger tab. The Army Ranger Course is one of the Army’s toughest leadership course with a concentration on small-unit tactics and combat leadership.  They look to develop proficiency in leading squad and platoon dismounted operations in an around-the-clock, all-climates and terrain atmosphere. The RAC is based on the first two weeks of the Army Ranger Course.

Capt. Nicholas Cunningham, 741st Missile Security Forces Squadron, Malmstrom AFB, Montana, was one of the five students who has been selected for the Ranger Training Assessment Course (RTAC) which is a dynamic two-week spin up to acclimate Army and sometimes joint or partner service members to the rigors of Ranger School.  If he successfully completes that course, he may be referred to Army Ranger School. ”The course taught us tons of lessons about working as a team, pushing past mental limits and mostly leadership,” he said. “Where we as Ranger students at first were acting as individuals, we had to shift toward operating together as a single unit. The more we acted by ourselves, the worse we did as a team. To meet the objective, whether it was packing our clothes within a certain amount of time or assaulting an enemy force, required every Ranger to do their part of the task and then some.”

After the first week of classroom and hands-on training, Staff Sgt. Franklin Sloat, RAC instructor from the 435th Security Forces Squadron at Ramstein Air Base, Germany,  said, “we select students for various leadership positions for the missions and they are then challenged to plan, prepare and conduct missions, whether it is a recon or ambush mission.” They plan backwards based on a higher headquarters Operation Order.

On the last day of missions, ten tired, hungry and cold Airmen made it to the finish line, having tested their mettle to the extremes. The 29 Airmen who began the course came from six major commands and represented security forces, tactical air control party, airfield management and battlefield Airmen specialties.  

The first female to finish the course, 2nd Lt. Chelsey Hibsch from Yokota Air Base, Japan, has also been selected for RTAC.  She said she saw more individuals fail as a follower because they didn’t want to go out of their way to help their partners succeed. “Those who were good followers tended to have others follow them with more enthusiasm because they had each other’s backs,” she said. “You learn how you react when everything is against you. Some individuals pressed on and others froze.”

The Air Force Security Forces Center, one of AFIMSC’s subordinate units, hosted the course. Twelve cadre instructors, all having been through the course and graduated Army Ranger School, as well as Army instructors, put the students through the mind-numbing days and nights.  The instructors provide this stress-oriented battle school for airmen to develop better leadership and command tools under the mental, emotional and physical strain.  They push the students to improve their resiliency and coping mechanisms.  

Below are the names of those who successfully met the challenge in the 19-01 Ranger 
Assessment Course and will be recommended to attend the Army Ranger Course. Congratulations to:
Staff Sgt. Paul Cdebaca/TACP/3 Air Support Operations Squadron, Joint Base Elmendorf - Richardson, Alaska
Staff Sgt. Mark Bunkley/TACP/350 SWTS – Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, Texas
Senior Airman Troy Hicks/TACP/ 7 Air Support Operations Squadron– Ft. Bliss, Texas
Senior Airman Aaron Lee/SF/9 Security Forces Squadron, Beale AFB, California
Senior Airman Zachary Scott/SF/802 Security Forces Squadron, JBSA – Lackland, Texas

A second group of Airmen have been recommended for RTAC along with Cunningham and Hibsch

Senior Airman Sage Featherstone/TACP/7 Air Support Operations Squadron, Ft. Bliss, Texas
Senior Airman Austin Flores/SF/75 Security Forces Squadron, Hill AFB, Utah
Staff Sgt. Brayden Morrow/SF/341 Security Support Squadron, Malmstrom AFB, Montana

Airmen from different career fields challenge themselves in the Ranger Assessment course which is a combat leadership course which can lead to attending Army Ranger School. The 29 Airmen who began the course came from six major commands and represented security forces, tactical air control party, airfield management and battlefield Airmen specialties. The RAC instructors provide this stress-oriented battle school for airmen to develop better leadership and command tools under the mental, emotional and physical strain. They push the students to improve their resiliency and coping mechanisms.